Please pay a visit!
http://coachingadvancedplayers.com/fast-break-attacks-its-all-about-quick-decision-making/
Yesterday had a very effective session with the U14 lads on crossing. Compliments to Mr Lai Pak Yung, our Head Coach, as this was his session.
Session theme: Crossing
Organisation:
Advanced Technical Practice (ATP) (unopposed):
Technical details:
Progression:
Coaching points:
Game:
Progressions/variations:
Coaching points:
The session is also a very good physical training as players are bound to shift from attacking to defending, vice versa, swiftly and continuously.
Of course, much more can be added to the session such as running patterns and different kinds of crossing such as early crosses, cut-backs or so.
By the way, the earlier post on inside-outside run has been posted on World Class Coaching’s coachingadvancedplayers.com
Please take a minute or two to pay a visit! Appreciate!
From now on I’ll post my videos on http://www.dailymotions.com.
Please subscribe!
http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/xpfx88
Maneuver – Napoli v Chelsea by Rico_Chan
The clash between the Reds and the Red Devils always provides football fans around the world with much entertainment. While much of the pre-match (and post match) talks were about the Suarez-Evra incident, the quality of the match is what I care about. Both teams managed to demonstrate some great attacking moves and combinations. (The following descriptions are based on the attached video clip edit by Soccerico.com.)
Crossover and clearing space
In the first Liverpool attack, the crossover made by Henderson and Maxi successfully created an open space for Maxi to receive and turn towards goal. The forward run by Carroll took Evans away to further increase the space for Maxi. Carroll then went on to drift onto the blind-side of Evans to free himself for a possible through ball from Maxi, only for Maxi to took a decent shot which was saved by De Gea.
Winger drifting inwards to leave space for full-back to run in
In Man U’s first attack, Valencia come inside to receive a pass. Jose Enrique, Liverpool’s left-back responsible for controlling Valencia, got attracted away with his target, leaving his area empty. Valencia then cleverly back-heeled the ball to the lurking Rafael who was sprinting into the channel left empty by Valencia (and Enrique). Chasing back, Enrique made a technical mistake and allowed Rafael to run deep and cross the ball in for a free Park Ji-Sung to slot it in. Carragher and Gerard were both responsible as you can see they were not tracking a forward running Park at all.
Center forward drifting aside, allowing winger to cut inside
In the next clip, Man U demonstrated yet another great attacking maneuver. This was an identical one with Man City’s first goal against Tottenham in last week Premier League game with Aguero and Nasri. Here we can see that Hernandez drifted away from his center forward position and took Skrtel a bit off-position. Carrick recognized this and played a wonderful ball into that gap for Wellbeck to run in. Credit to Skrtel for his recovery run that saved Liverpool’s day.
Last but not least, a defensive error from Man U
Liverpool’s second goal highlights coaches’ universal dilemma: do we want our defenders to go for areal duels if it requires them to leave their ‘zone’ and thus corrupting the compactness of the defense line? Here Evans was drawn out of his position only to be beaten by Carroll in the air; Evra, on the other hand, did not recognize the gap early enough which allowed Kuyt to control the ball without any pressure.
P.S. Many criticized the signing of Carroll for Liverpool (mainly because of his price tag I guess); but as he is already here, maybe Liverpool fans should start to appreciate him. As you can see from the clip, he is not as bad as some depicts him. He may not be scoring at the moment, but he’s doing a good job in enhancing team play.
It’s the year of Dragon! I wish all my fellow friends and coaches all the best and may the beautiful game continue to inspire all of us.
Quite a few things have happened around the turn of the year: the session I promise to report back (the 3 teams keep-possession game), the last bit of the UEFA B Coaching License in Reading, the 2nd leg of the Copa Del Rey and also the Asian Super Challenge Cup.
Training session with U-14 team
So the theme of the session was about ‘Negative transition and pressing’: so I was trying to get the boys stay ‘switched on’ when possession is lost high up field and press immediately.
I started with a normal 8 v 2 one-touch keeping possession drill (10 yds x 10 yds) to get their mentality right and then moved on to the ‘three-teams’ keeping possession game. If you recall, the disadvantage about this drill is that it’s non-directional and the defending team will not have a clear direction to defend against. To cope with it, I added 3 goals as follows:
The outcome was not quite desirable. Immediately after I’ve changed the settings, I recognize the pitch was actually very small and almost doubled it. Another thing is that the players needed extra time to actually figure out which direction they are going to attack (due to the fact that sometimes it’s not a clear-cut case to decide which team is to become the defending team). At that point I recognized the drill is actually too complicated and it actually complicates the game: in a real game, it’s almost instinctive: we have the ball; we don’t have the ball. But here in this drill, all players need to possess extra information: which team has lost the possession and their goal is to be attacked now.
Having thought of that, I ceased the drill and moved on to a simple 8v8 SSG instead. After all, the theme is more about the mentality of the players more than anything else. Now that I do not have an immediate answer to the problem, I guess it’s best to switch to a more ‘game realistic’ practice and let the players have more time to play (and be coached) rather than having me spending time trying to fix the drill that is not working. I feel like a lot of time has been wasted in the 3-team drill and, yea, that’s why coaches need to spend thousands of hours to accumulate that experience so that they know how to react when a drill is not working to maximize training effectiveness and efficiency. Good lesson though.
UEFA B
Day 13 of the UEFA B Coaching License marks the end of the course. The final assessment in a month’s time is what’s left. BRING IT ON!
As much of a cliché as it sounds, it’s been an unbelievable half-year. We’ve all learned and progressed as coaches and it’s always good to have companions growing together. I must say I enjoy many of the sessions delivered during the last 3 days of the course. In Chinese there’s a saying that ‘when you walk along with two other, your mentor must be there’. It’s definitely the case. Seeing how other coaches improve is a great experience because you learn from them. Really can’t wait to test myself and put all the things I’ve learned into practice.
Starting to feel a bit sentimental here. It’s always like that when you look back, isn’t it? I’d better stop for now before I start to sound like an old-man.
More to follow on the matches I’ve seen during this week.
Three weeks after the end of the first block, we were back to Wokefiled Park, Reading to attend days 6-9, during which we needed to deliver a UEFA B related session as an initial progress check.
We were given our topic at the end of day 7 and given that night to prepare for it. A little thing that happened as I was given my topic was that all the session themes before mine start with ‘Coach a team to…’ and I’d already written these words on my notepad when suddenly it went: ‘Rico, coach a striker to play against a tight marking center back in a function’. Alright…
I have to admit that I was carried away by the words ‘coach A striker’ for my initial preparation: do I really only coach one player? (Of course, for those who have been through the process, or if you happen to be a coach instructor, will know the answer is a big NO) Having analyzed the topic in greater detail, I figured actually the theme assists me in ‘affecting a unit/ the team’s performance because a restriction/instruction (to mark tight) is imposed on the center back, which will no doubt affect the defensive shape. With that in mind, I’ve prepared to divide my coaching points into two categories: the individual movements of the striker to 1. create space for himself and 2. for his teammates.
So here’s the set-up of the function.
Organization:
Attacking team: 2 FWDs, 3 MFs, 1 FB and server
Defending team: 2 CBs, 1 FB, 3 MFs and GK
Coaching points:
1. Passing selection and priority (behind defenders/ to foot/ to space)
2. CF checks away from CB, spin into space created for himself/go short to create space behind him
3. CF ball protection technique
4. Other CF to attack space created
The session went ‘okay’ at most because I was nervous. The reason was that my first ‘picture’ did not happen at all during the first 5 mins. The even numbers in midfield meant my team needed to work extra hard to maintain possession in order to advance the ball forward. Given the hard work during the previous days and also in the morning, it proved to be too much to ask from them. I think I waited too long before I imposed a starting position to take one of the defending midfielders out of the game for a second or two. After that I was able to progress through my coaching points logically.
However, that had already cost me some precious time and I was too focused in following my ‘logical progression’ and I missed some of the good movements from my striker because that’s supposed to be the next point. There was a big ‘cross’ in my observation sheet because it doesn’t show that I ‘exhibited knowledge and understanding of how to improve performance’.
Another thing that I struggled is that because the players (the other coaches) are all good players so I tended not to go for the Level 2 technical demonstration like showing them how to shield the ball and stuff like that. Obviously, I missed the essence of assessments: it is what it is after all. It’s like a driving test during which you have to demonstrate your know-how and knowledge even the situation doesn’t REALLY require you to do so. Anyway, after this practice I have added a lot more physical demonstrations and visual aids to my coaching and found it very effective, especially for younger players whose ability to translate what they hear into what they see is not that good.
Frankly speaking I was quite shocked with my performance because deep down I really think that was a poor session and sub-standard. On reflection, though, these experience is what I need exactly to improve as a coach because I have never been clearer about what I need to do specifically to be better.
One thing that I wrote on my Personal Action Plan was: ‘I think when a coached action did not happen rightly, I should think about ’cause and result’: before working on the receiving end I should think of the delivering end first’. For many, this could be quite obvious; but that’s reality, sometimes we tend to forget the basics when we go further down the road.
So I took everything from this session, went back to my environment and worked on them, which is the most important thing.
Quite a lot of my fellow coaches, like Costa, Herman and Jun, were asking about my experience of the UEFA B Coaching License so far. Well, let’s start with the sessions I’ve delivered in the course so far and we’ll see how it developed.
To the end of the first block (Day 1-5), coaches were asked to delivered a 20-25 minutes session (not really a session, more like a practice drill) on any theme the candidates chose. The purpose of this practice, according to the instructors, was to check the ‘basics’ of us being Level 2 coaches. We were not supposed to have grasped any ‘UEFA B essence’ back then since we were only exposed to the new stuff for less than a week’s time with no ‘grass time’ whatsoever.
With that, the candidates generally opt for two different paths: some took advantage of this first opportunity to practice what was shown during that past few days and went for practices that were demonstrated by the instructors; some chose to go with their familiar practices and showcase ‘what they’ve got in their lockers’ (a phrase that’s being loved by all of us after introduced by one of the instructors, Steve.) I am one of the latter group. My rationale behind this was because I wanted to really check my standards with those of the instructors (and presumably those of The FA) and I could only do that by doing something I think is good and see how they would like it, or me, to improve.
So I picked a drill which I practiced with my U-14 boys quite a lot during last season on ‘Retaining Possession’. I first saw the original session on the book ‘Soccer Awareness: Developing the Thinking Player’ by Wayne Harrison and actually the focus/theme of the practice can easily be ‘concentration during transitions’.
Organisation:
– 3 teams of 3 players playing in a 25 yds x 25 yes grid with plenty supply of balls around the grid
– 2 teams play against the defending team (so it’s always 6 v 3 to the teams with possession)
– Same rules as basic possession keeping game: the team who lost possession become the defending team immediately. The coach can help keep up the momentum by playing a ball in once the ball is out.
– The key to this game is high tempo and continuity.
Progression/restrictions: (depending on the situation, the coach can add a whole lot of restrictions to bring out a coaching point)
– team with possession can only pass to a different team player (so if blues and yellows have the ball, a blue can only pass to a yellow and vice versa) to make the players scan early before receiving the ball
– limited touches (I used 2-touches to coach direction of 1st touch)
Coaching points:
– continuous scanning during the game, always know about the environment (Technical detail TD)
– Body stance before receiving (TD)
– 1st touch direction, away from pressure (TD)
– highly focused as switch between attacking and defending is very quick
Originally I also wanted to bring out some of the Principles of Play such as:
– dispersal: width and length
– support and movement: angles and distances
– penetration: split passes between defenders
but I failed to do so to a large extent which will be explained below.
What am I defending against? Why are we keeping possession?
While I was able to deliver the TD’s to a certain level of success (at least I find the relevant seconds to pause play and step in), I struggle to deal with the Principles of Play because the practice is NON-DIRECTIONAL: teams with possession is keeping possession for the sake of keeping it and, more importantly, the defending team does not have a specific ‘target’ or ‘goal’ to defend against. Due to this reason, at a certain time (before I put on restrictions), the defending team struggled to take possession back (because without the reference point of the goal they are defending) which made the practice quite unrealistic.
Also, because of the lack of direction, the teams with possession did not have the incentive to play riskier passes to split the defending team. They simply passed the ball around the grid without any purpose.
Restrictions or not?
On the restrictions, while I am a believer of placing certain restrictions on practices to force players to think about the targeted coaching point, my observer, Ben, put a big question mark on that part because they are not realistic. For instance, in the game, it is the pressure a player is facing that decides how many touches he will use before releasing the ball. On reflection, I agree with that. Say, if I want to coach a players’ first touch direction and the ‘picture’ doesn’t arise, it’s because the way the practice is set up is not helping to create that picture. However, sometimes I still use restrictions because of reality: sometimes it saves time to bring out a coaching point by placing restrictions; and, another good thing about restrictions is that once they are lifted, you can really check the understandings of your players: you don’t start to appreciate the freedom you have until it’s been taken away from you.
As you can see, assessments are good for stimulating thoughts. The best thing is that you find out how others think about your stuff, and, through constructive discussion, you can rationalize your adaptations (or not) which means you really take that in as your own stuff and not something that’s been imposed on you.
So after this we were sent home to start digesting the new stuff and ‘spend time on grass’ for 3 weeks before all of us met again in early September to spend another 4 days together, and, of course, delivery of another session (which is UEFA B relevant).
Let’s take a look at my second session next time, which proved to be somewhat a shell shocker for me.